NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Round-up: PNY, MSI, ASUS

NVIDIA's GeForce 9 Series was first introduced in February of this year by way of the 9600 GT launch. Admittedly, we thought it was interesting to see a new GeForce series launch, not with the flagship card, but rather with a new midrange offering. It makes perfect sense, though, considering that more people can afford midrange cards than can afford high-end, flagship cards. Since this launch, NVIDIA has added to the GeForce 9 Series by introducing the dual-GPU GeForce 9800 GX2 and the GeForce 9800 GTX. So far, the GeForce 9 Series seems to be another successful line from the NVIDIA camp.
In this article, we are going to expand our coverage of the GeForce 9600 GT by doing another round-up of three retail cards: the PNY Verto 9600 GT, the MSI N9600GT OC, and the ASUS EN9600GT SILENT. As you might expect, all three of these cards sport 512MB of GDDR3 and a 256-bit memory interface. What you may not expect is how different these three cards actually are. Two feature custom coolers, one of which is passive, making it silent. Because of these custom coolers, these two cards are dual-slot solutions while the third uses the single-slot reference cooler. Only one of them ships with a factory overclock while the other two utilize NVIDIA's reference clocks. We are eager to see how these three cards compare when it comes to performance, noise and heat. Let's jump right in and take a look at the specifications of all three side-by-side.
|
![]()
|
![]()
|
![]()
|
As you can see, the MSI N9600GT OC sports a slight overclock of 700 MHz for the core clock, 1,900 MHz for the memory clock, and 1,680 MHz for the shader clock, while the PNY Verto 9600 GT and ASUS EN9600GT SILENT ship with no overclock (which puts them at the reference speeds of 650 MHz, 1,800 MHz, and 1,625 MHz, respectively). All three cards support the PCI Express 2.0 interface, 2-way SLI and DirectX 10. Each card sports two dual-link DVI outputs, one HDTV/S-video output, and a 6-pin PCI Express power connector.
Western Digital Velociraptor 300GB SATA HD

Western Digital's Raptor line of high performance hard drives has been a long-time favorite of PC enthusiasts since its introduction several years ago. When WD's Raptors first hit, their 10K RPM spindle speeds allowed for much lower access times than the more common 7200 RPM desktop drives of the time, and overall relative performance was strong. Many users were put off by the relatively low capacities of the Raptor, which debuted at 36GB and topped out at 150GB, but they were still wildly successful amongst enthusiasts regardless.
As time wore on though, Western Digital's competitors introduced faster and faster, high capacity drives, that began to out-perform the Raptor in a number of key metrics. WD too released some fast, high-capacity drives that out-performed even the fastest Raptor in many scenarios. WD released a number of more eco-friendly drives under their "Green Power" badge as well, which may have led some to believe WD's focus on the enthusiast sector had diminished. However, as you'll see today, that is definitely not the case.
Today, Western Digital is unveiling the brand new Velociraptor WD3000GLFS 300GB hard drive. Like the previous generation Raptors, the new WD Velociraptor sports a 10K RPM spindle speed, but the drives are actually quite different. As you'll see, this new Velociraptor is simply in a league of its own, thanks to some innovative design choices.

|
|
|
*Note: MTBF now estimated at 1.4M hrs.
In a side by side feature comparison, the WD Velociraptor resembles the older Raptors. The drives share the aforementioned 10K RPM spindle speed, they have the same 16MB buffer, the same reliability ratings, and acoustic and environmental characteristics. The WD Velociraptor's new design, however, offers significantly increased performance, both in terms of access times, IOPS, and data transfer rates.
We should also point out, that while the Raptor line and Velociraptor share the same acoustic specifications, the drives definitely do not sound alike. With the new Velociraptor, the high-pitched whine emitted from the previous-gen Raptors has seemingly been eliminated. However, the Velociraptor's heads can easily be heard chunking along within the drive.
AMD Phenom X3 8750 Tri-Core Processor

When AMD first announced plans to introduce triple-core processors back in September of last year, reaction to the news was mixed. Some felt that AMD was simply planning to pass off partially functional Phenom X4 processors as triple-core products, making lemonade from lemons if you will. Others thought it was a good way for AMD to increase bottom line profits, getting more usable die from a single silicon wafer and mitigating yield loss. We were somewhat perplexed by the first reaction. This is an age-old strategy in the semiconductor space and after all, the graphics guys have been selling GPUs with non-functional units for years. AMD was simply borrowing a play from ATI's playbook.
If you take a step back and think about it though, who really cares outside of the enthusiast niche'? Isn't it the ultimate quality of the end-product what's most important? If tri-core processors end up outperforming competing dual-core chips, and are less expensive than quad-cores, wouldn't salvaging otherwise unusable die from a wafer be a good move on AMD's part?
Without actual product, it's tough to argue either way, of course. But thankfully, AMD has delivered their first batch of triple-core processors and we can finally put the whole debate to rest.

AMD Phenom Retail Box
|
| Model / Processor Frequency: | AMD Phenom Processor Model X3 8750, 8650, 8450 / 2.4GHz, 2.3GHz, 2.1GHz |
| L1 Cache Sizes: | 64K of L1 instruction and 64K of L1 data cache per core (384KB total L1 per processor) |
| L2 Cache Sizes: | 512KB of L2 data cache per core (1.5MB total L2 per processor) |
| L3 Cache Size: | 2MB |
| Memory Controller Type: | Integrated 128-bit wide memory controller, capable of being configured for dual 64-bit channels for simultaneous read/writes |
| Memory Controller Frequency: | Up to 1.8GHz with Dual Dynamic Power Management |
| Types of Memory: | Support for unregistered DIMMs up to PC2 8500 (DDR2-1066MHz) |
| HyperTransport 3.0: | One 16-bit/16-bit link @ up to 3600MHz full duplex |
| Total Processor Bandwidth: | Up to 31.5 GB/s bandwidth |
| Packaging: | Socket AM2+ 940-pin organic micro pin grid array (micro-PGA) (backward compatible with Socket AM2) |
| Fab location: | AMD's Fab 36 wafer fabrication facilities in Dresden, Germany |
| Process Technology: | 65nm (.065-micron) Silicon on Insulator (SOI) |
| Approximate Transistor count: | approx. 450 million (65nm) |
| Approximate Die Size: | 285 mm2 (65nm) |
| Nominal Voltage: | 1.05-1.25 Volts |
| Max Ambient Case Temp: | 70 degrees Celsius |
| Max TDP: | 95 Watts |
| ACP: | *to be announced after launch |
| Future Memory Controller Note: | Future 45nm processors versions are planned to include support for DDR3 memory |
As you probaly expect, the new AMD Phenom X3 8750 looks exactly like any other socket AM2+ processor outfitted with AMD's standard heat spreader. The chip also uses the same packaging and socket as current Phenom processors; it is only the silicon underneath that has changed.
The AMD Phenom X3 8750 is a 2.4GHz processor manufactured using AMD's 65nm Silicon on Insulator process technology. The chip has a Max TDP of 95W and has official support for a 1.8GHz memory controller and HT 3.0 frequency with Dual Dynamic Power Management technology. Although some AMD processors have support for a 2GHz memory controller and HT3.0 link frequency, not every CPU is rated for these high-end frequencies. Also note the "50" in the processor's model number. That "50" means the CPU is based on the recently released B3 revision to the Phenom core which does not suffer from the infamous TLB errata.
Samsung SyncMaster 2243BW Wide Screen LCD

Perhaps introduced to help mitigate the large market gap between 20" and 24" monitors, or more likely because it is simply more efficient to produce 22" sheets of glass at the current batch of LCD panel factories, 22" LCDs came in just above 20" models in cost but offered two more inches of screen real estate. Over the last half year, the price of 22" inch LCDs has creeped lower and ever closer to 20" LCDs to the point where they can regularly be found for nearly the same price. A quick look at the HotHardware price matching system reveals that 22" monitors currently start at $190, with 20" monitors starting at $180 and 19" monitors occupying the $160 area. At around $8.5-$9 per inch, the 22" screen size is one of the current sweet spots in the LCD market. This makes the 22" screen size very attractive and luckily most LCD monitor manufacturers have at least one 22" to offer, so there are plenty of models to choose from. Today we will be looking at one of the latest additions to the 22" market segment, the Samsung 2243BW.
Samsung is one of the worlds largest LCD panel manufacturers and they offer an extensive line of LCD products including one of, if not the biggest catalog of 22" monitors of any LCD manufacturer. Samsung's website displays 8 different 22" models and that is just on their US website. There are literally dozens of 22" models that Samsung offers outside of the US, although many of these are nothing more than localized versions. Part of the reason why Samsung has so many 22" models is because they offer monitors tailored to just about any setting, from sleek multimedia sets to minimalistic business models. The Samsung 2243BW we are looking at today is one of the newest members of the 22" LCD line-up and it appears to be aimed at the business market.
|
| Display Size | 22" (55.9cm) diagonal and viewable image |
| Display Type | Thin-Film Transistor LCD Active Matrix, TN panel |
| Display Viewing Angle | 170 degrees horizontal, 160 degrees vertical |
| Scanning Frequency | Horizontal: 30-81 KHz, Vertical: 50-85 Hz |
| Input Terminal | Analog (15-pin D-sub VGA) and Digital (DVI-D) |
| Display Brightness | 300 cd/m2 (typical) |
| Native Resolution | 1680x1050 @ 60 Hz |
| Contrast Ratio | DC 8000:1 (1000:1 static contrast ratio) |
| Display Color | 16.7 Million |
| Response Time | 5 ms (GTG) |
| Pixel Pitch | 0.282 mm |
| Power Source | Input Rating: 100 to 240V~ |
| Power Consumption | 45W in operating mode, <1w> |
| Operating Environment | 50-104 degrees F, 10-80% RH (non-condensing) |
| Storage Environment | -4-113 degrees F, 5-95% RH (non-condensing) |
| Stand | Height Adjustable, Pivot, Swivel, Tilt |
| Mounting | Standard VESA 4-hole 100 mm x 100 mm |
| Dimensions | 19.9 x 13.1 x 2.8 in. (505.5 x 331.5 x 67.6 mm) |
| Dimensions (with stand) | 19.9 x 16.4 x 8.6 in. (505.5 x 417.2 x 217.5 mm) |
| Weight | Monitor with Stand: 14 lbs. (6.35 Kg) Package: 18.07 lbs. (8.20 Kg) |
| EMI Standard | FCC Class B |
| EPA Energy Star | This monitor is EPA ENERGY STAR® compliant and ENERGY2000 compliant when used with a computer equipped with VESA DPM functionality. |
| TCO Certification | TCO'03 |
| Included Accessories | AC Power Cable, D-sub Cable, Cable Management Clip |
| Special Features | MagicBright3, Off timer, Image Size Colour Effect, Customised key, MagicWizard & MagicTune with AssetManagement, Windows Vista Premium, DVI with HDCP, MagicRotation S/W (Pivot) Safe Mode (DownScaling in UXGA) |
While the Samsung 2243BW may be aimed at business use, its specifications suggest that it should be capable of quite a bit more than just spreadsheets and word documents. With good viewing angles, decent 5ms response time, good brightness and excellent 1000:1 static contrast ratio, the 2243BW should be well equipped to handle any multimedia you may throw its way. The 2243BW is actually slightly better specified than the wildly popular Samsung 226BW, one of the most widely and highly recommended 22" monitors.

One sign that gives away the 2243BW's business orientation is the prominently displayed TCO'03 certification badge. TCO is a series of certifications for office equipment that stipulate requirements for products to help improve the working environment. The requirements for each TCO certification focuses on four main areas; ergonomics, emissions, ecology and energy. The certifications are categorized in years, although this does not mean a TCO certification for one year is necessarily better or more up to date than another. Instead each certification is meant for a different class or group of office product. The TCO group of certifications cover a wide variety of products including computers, mobile phones, printers, furniture and of course, monitors. The TCO'03 certification that the Samsung 2243BW bears, for instance, specifically pertains to monitors. TCO'03 certifies that any monitor bearing its mark meets a minimum level of specification concerning display resolution, brightness, contrast, reflections, color reproduction, ergonomics, electromagnetic emissions, electrical safety, energy usage and environmental impact (ecology). All TCO'03 certified displays manufactured after 2006 are also required to meet the RoHS directive. While the TCO'03 isn't a mark of distinction like a THX certification would be for speakers, it does somewhat guarantee that a certified product will be relatively pleasant to use in an office environment.









.jpg)